Skip to content
On August 15, 2024, the Department of Defense (DoD) proposed a Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) rule that introduces a 72-hour incident reporting requirement for cybersecurity incidents and mandates Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) 2.0 compliance at contract award. For DoD and Intelligence Community (IC) contractors handling Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI), this rule adds complexity to CMMC 2.0, particularly for rapid incident response. This blog post examines the implications of the new DFARS rule, highlights the importance of robust incident reporting systems, and provides practical strategies to achieve CMMC Level 2 compliance while meeting the 72-hour reporting mandate.
Understanding the New DFARS Rule
The proposed DFARS rule, building on the May 2024 draft, strengthens cybersecurity requirements for contractors. Key provisions include:
- CMMC Compliance at Award: Contractors must achieve CMMC certification (Level 1 for Federal Contract Information, Level 2 for CUI) at the time of contract award, with no post-award remediation allowed.
- 72-Hour Incident Reporting: Contractors must report cybersecurity incidents impacting CUI or mission-critical systems to the DoD within 72 hours, aligning with DFARS 252.204-7012.
- Level 2 Assessments: CUI-handling contractors must implement 110 NIST SP 800-171 controls, verified by third-party assessments starting in Q1 2025.
The 72-hour reporting requirement demands rapid detection, analysis, and communication, necessitating robust IT systems and well-defined processes. Non-compliance risks contract ineligibility and supply chain exclusion, making preparation urgent.
Why Incident Reporting and Compliance Matter
The new DFARS rule increases the stakes for contractors, as failure to meet CMMC 2.0 or incident reporting requirements can lead to:
- Loss of contracts due to non-compliance at award or inadequate incident response.
- Compromised CUI, undermining national security and mission success.
- Audit failures, as DoD and third-party assessors verify rapid reporting capabilities.
- Supply chain vulnerabilities, as unreported incidents weaken the Defense Industrial Base (DIB).
Robust systems for incident reporting and CMMC compliance ensure contractors remain secure, competitive, and audit-ready.
Strategies for Rapid Incident Reporting and CMMC 2.0 Compliance
Contractors can prepare for the DFARS rule and CMMC Level 2 assessments with the following strategies, focusing on rapid incident reporting and NIST SP 800-171 compliance:
1. Assess Incident Response Needs
Start by evaluating your organization’s ability to detect, analyze, and report incidents within 72 hours:
- Map CUI Systems: Identify systems handling CUI, such as email, file storage, or collaboration tools, to focus incident monitoring efforts.
- Review Current Processes: Assess existing incident detection and reporting workflows to identify gaps, such as slow detection or unclear responsibilities.
- Align with NIST Controls: Ensure incident response capabilities meet NIST SP 800-171 controls, particularly IR-2 (Incident Response) and IR-6 (Incident Reporting).
This assessment guides the development of a rapid reporting system tailored to CMMC and DFARS requirements.
2. Build a Rapid Incident Reporting System
A well-defined system ensures incidents are reported within 72 hours:
- Deploy Detection Tools: Use security information and event management (SIEM) systems or log aggregators to monitor CUI systems for anomalies, such as unauthorized access or data exfiltration.
- Automate Alerts: Configure real-time alerts for potential incidents, enabling immediate investigation to meet the 72-hour deadline.
- Define Workflows: Establish clear procedures for incident identification, analysis, containment, and reporting, assigning roles to IT, compliance, and leadership teams.
- Practice Reporting: Use DoD’s Defense Industrial Base Cybersecurity (DIBCS) portal or test submissions to familiarize staff with the 72-hour reporting process.
A streamlined system minimizes delays and ensures compliance with DFARS 7012.
3. Leverage Microsoft 365 GCC High for Incident Reporting
Microsoft 365 GCC High, a DoD-compliant cloud platform, supports rapid incident reporting and CMMC 2.0 compliance:
- Enable Logging: Activate audit logs for user activity, access attempts, and security events to detect incidents, aligning with AU-2 (Audit Events) and IR-4 (Incident Handling).
- Use Security Dashboards: Monitor GCC High’s admin center for alerts on suspicious activity, such as failed logins or DLP violations, to trigger rapid response.
- Secure Reporting Channels: Use encrypted email or Teams channels to communicate incident details internally and to the DoD, meeting MP-1 (Media Protection).
- Automate Notifications: Configure automated alerts for policy violations or unauthorized access to accelerate incident identification.
GCC High’s features simplify compliance with incident response and reporting controls.
4. Document Compliance with an SSP and POA&M
Comprehensive documentation is essential for CMMC assessments and DFARS audits:
- System Security Plan (SSP): Detail how incident response and reporting systems meet NIST SP 800-171 controls, including detection tools, workflows, and GCC High configurations.
- Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M): Identify gaps in incident response, such as incomplete logging or slow reporting, with remediation steps and timelines.
- Record Evidence: Collect logs, alert configurations, and incident response plans to demonstrate compliance during assessments.
- Update Regularly: Revise documentation to reflect system changes or new DFARS requirements, ensuring accuracy for auditors.
Clear documentation proves readiness for rapid reporting and CMMC certification.
5. Test and Refine Incident Response Processes
Regular testing ensures your incident response system meets the 72-hour mandate:
- Conduct Tabletop Exercises: Simulate incidents, such as a phishing attack or data breach, to test detection, analysis, and reporting workflows.
- Measure Response Time: Track how long it takes to identify, investigate, and report incidents, aiming for well under 72 hours.
- Identify Weaknesses: Address bottlenecks, such as unclear roles or slow detection, to improve efficiency.
- Train Staff: Educate IT and compliance teams on incident response protocols, including DoD reporting requirements, to meet AT-2 (Security Awareness).
Testing builds confidence and ensures compliance under pressure.
6. Maintain Systems with Managed IT Practices
Managed IT ensures systems remain secure and reporting-ready:
- Monitor Continuously: Use SIEM or GCC High tools to track threats in real time, supporting IR-4 (Incident Handling) and AU-6 (Audit Review).
- Patch Promptly: Apply updates to close vulnerabilities that could lead to incidents, aligning with SI-2 (Flaw Remediation).
- Secure Backups: Store encrypted CUI backups in compliant environments to enable recovery without delaying reporting, per MP-4 (Media Storage).
- Review Logs: Analyze logs weekly to detect early signs of incidents, ensuring rapid response and compliance with AU-3 (Content of Audit Records).
These practices maintain system integrity and audit readiness.
7. Prepare for CMMC Assessments and DFARS Audits
CMMC Level 2 assessments and DFARS audits will verify incident reporting capabilities:
- Compile Evidence: Organize SSPs, POA&Ms, logs, and incident response records for C3PAO assessors, including examples of simulated reports.
- Conduct Mock Audits: Test incident response systems against NIST controls, focusing on IR-6 (Incident Reporting) and AU-2 (Audit Events).
- Train Teams: Prepare staff to explain incident detection and reporting processes to auditors, demonstrating compliance.
- Remediate Gaps: Fix issues identified in mock audits, such as incomplete logs or slow workflows, to ensure certification success.
Proactive preparation minimizes assessment risks and aligns with DFARS requirements.
Looking Ahead: Incident Reporting and CMMC 2.0 in 2025
As the DFARS rule takes effect, contractors should anticipate:
- Stricter Oversight: DoD will enforce the 72-hour reporting mandate, with audits verifying rapid response capabilities.
- Increased Threat Activity: State-sponsored cyberattacks targeting CUI will demand robust detection and reporting systems.
- Supply Chain Scrutiny: Prime contractors will require subcontractors to demonstrate incident reporting readiness to maintain compliance.
Staying ahead of these trends ensures contractors remain secure and contract-eligible.
Conclusion
The August 2024 DFARS rule introduces a 72-hour incident reporting requirement and mandates CMMC 2.0 compliance at contract award, adding complexity for DoD/IC contractors. By assessing incident response needs, building rapid reporting systems, leveraging Microsoft 365 GCC High, and preparing for assessments, contractors can meet these requirements while protecting CUI. These strategies not only ensure compliance with CMMC Level 2 and DFARS but also strengthen cybersecurity, safeguarding national security and supporting mission success in a high-threat environment.
